Have you ever justified sticking with what you have because you’ve already invested a great deal of time, money or effort?
If so, you may have made a common human logical mistake: the sunk cost fallacy.
And if this applies to the hospitality tech you use, it might be costing you more than you realise.
Join us as we break down what sunk cost means for hospitality, the effect it has on growth potential, and how operators can break the cycle.
What is sunk cost?
The sunk cost fallacy can be best described as the mistake of ‘throwing good money after bad’ – in other words, staying with what you have because it was expensive instead of cutting your losses and investing in a stronger, more appropriate alternative.
When it comes to growing your hospitality brand, the results of continuing to invest in a system that doesn’t work are nothing short of disastrous.
What does sunken cost look like in hospitality tech?
Hospitality tech has been done the same way for a long time.
When building a tech stack, operators would find the best-in-class POS, and then build point solutions around this to manage all the other parts of the operation.
So with the POS in the middle, day-to-day operations would depend on a fragmented web of suppliers, platforms and solutions requiring complicated integrations between each one.
This used to be the only approach to tech there was, but things have changed.
There are now a number of different ways to build a tech stack, some of which use a single platform to manage the entire order process, eliminating the need for complicated integrations and fragmented operations.
But despite 67% of operators at larger brands feeling frustrated with the tech they use, many of them stick with it, hamstringing their operation’s ability to grow outside the limit of this old way.
Why?
The sunk cost fallacy.